Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Bummer

This sad thing happened recently: the 3 people who started Television Without Pity have left one year after Bravo bought the site. Back then, they promised nothing would change, but you can't really promise that. Like any good gossip hound, I am searching around for what's behind it all - some of it I can guess, sure, but other blogs are trying to fill in the rest. A commenter said this: "People think you can take something small and beloved and make it big and not lose anything in translation. And it rarely works." Bean wrote about feeling behind technologically, and I feel similarly about my relationship to the blog world. It's so incredibly meta to talk about blogging in a blog, but if you'll just join me in the wormhole for a minute, I'll spit it out. Here's the thing - I haven't lost touch with reality to the degree that this should be meaningful in the way that real, sad, horrible things are meaningful and invite reflection, but I have a long history reading stuff on this site, which I discovered through Entertainment Weekly like in 2000 when it was called Mighty Big TV and did like 10 tv shows. That was its second evolution, from Dawson's Wrap, which was I'm sure fabulous and awesome and in the dark ages of the internet, back when blogs were in their infancy and people were mostly on dial-up. Which all sounds so corny and old-mannish and, again, I know it's not actually significant except it is, sort of, in the newish world of getting information through blogs, and how that world looks too old for its age, like a trashy LA girl who tans too much and eats a Triscuit a week, and in the emerging reality within that world that corporations show up really late to every party, and when they do they are always a buzzkill, even though the people within them don't all mean to be.

I first visited them because good writers - most of whom were/are freelance or even employed full-time as writers - write funny recaps of television shows, with lots of editorial commentary and not like "I really didn't like it when Haley said she wanted a divorce from Nathan. Booo!" like they do over at TVGuide.com, but funny, sarcastic, intelligent jokes of the more highbrow and, it must be said, snobby variety. Which, I'm okay with that, even if I have to look up a bunch of the allusions on Wikipedia. I am aware there are conflicting ideas (even in my own head) about if this is awesome or a supreme waste of time, but I love tv shows and I love reading about them. It enhances the experience, just like reading Dahlia Lithwick enhances the experience of examining the rulings of the Supreme Court . . . well, okay, that's a stretch. I can't really justify doubling my television consumption in this way, so I just operate under the assumption that it's fine. Ish. Except now it's all changing. Like most changes, I don't take it well.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

We have a whole new ballgame

My friend Al sent me this link, because I missed the speech. She suggested that it was one of the most moving and thoughtful speeches ever made on the issue of race in America, and I agree. The offscreen audience seemed to sit so rapt I forgot there even was an audience until halfway through and they burst into applause over one of the more stump-speechy phrases, and they let a few more bursts slip after that. It is honest and forthright about his relationship to the many races in his own heritage, and a real, non-political response to the recent diatribe of his pastor. There is an honest assessment of racism as it's seen from both sides, and gives a non-pandering voice to each perspective. I have written before that I haven't fully drunk the Obama kool-aid (and he mentions some of what he represents politically near the end, in terms of racism - it's still not pandering, but it's where he and I diverge) but among the many compliments I can pay him, he is a wonderful orator. There is a lot to say and ponder about this topic, and I support Obama's taking up that banner. John Stewart apparently said "on a Tuesday at 11 a.m., a Presidential candidate actually spoke to Americans about race as though we were adults." It is a very important speech for this historical election, and probably beyond.

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Hee hee

Stay-at-home moms/wives should totally copy the email signature of this girl I know. It goes like this (subbing my name for hers):

Alitris
An Helpmeet

Draggin' all them bags like that

I love this new bag in Bean's store. So summery and beachy!

Celebrities: They're just like us!

Spotted: John & Elizabeth Edwards outside their country compound. Mrs. Edwards was perched on a berm doing something to their fence while the Senator stood precariously close to Old Greensboro Road wearing shorty Duke blue shorts and a Carolina blue t-shirt, watching his wife. Not really helping, though. They have a Gator, and the Senator has chicken legs. XOXO

Thursday, March 6, 2008

If you are in my family, this will make you sad





















How did they give up that pool? Sigh.

Monday, March 3, 2008

Caliente Pocket

You guys, I totally ate a Hot Pocket for dinner tonight. I know, really gross. Instead of judging me, watch this.

Frogs and toads

Before our lovely weekend in La Petite Roche to visit the delicious Charlie Boy, Bean told me she would be checking a huge suitcase full of baby boy clothes (like 4 babies' worth, including the hand-me-downs from her sisters-in-law) sizes newborn up to 12 months. I said, "Aren't you concerned about your next baby not having any clothes then?" And she announced, "Oh, I'm not having another boy," in this voice, like, didn't you get the memo? Then in church we sat behind a cute little family where the mom was sitting alone (we postulated that her husband must be in the bishopric, like the recently-called Heff) with her boy, boy, girl, girl. Her dream family, Bean said. And the new baby girl even had a binkie.

I was thinking of this today while listening to a 2002 This American Life repeat podcast. It's about testosterone, so mostly doesn't apply here, but at the end (starts at minute 46:05) there was this sweet piece from a woman in Canada who has 2 children - a 15-year old boy named Owen and a tween girl named Georgia. She was trying, on the radio and on a road trip, to get to know what Owen was thinking at any given moment, about any given subject. His answer was mostly: "[big pause] I don't really know." His mother can't figure out how to talk to him about anything, and attributes it to the basic difference between teenage boys and girls - or at least her own. She basically says she doesn't really want to put her kids in a stereotype class, except that they kind of do fit the profile, so what do you want? Girls are chatty, given to many details, overanalyzation, and fits of crying. Boys keep most things to themselves, are prone to drama in journals, blogs, songwriting, or their guitars, and find questions about their personal philosophies intrusive and beside the point.

So yeah, that future seems a little grim for a mom of boys like Bean, especially since her boys are little and say things like "wuv you too, Mom." It's hard to predict which of her kids will be the more reserved, sullen one - Buddy is so effusive right now, and funny and smart, that it's hard to imagine him becoming the kind of teenager who won't really talk, but I think I might be able to see Owie that way. Not that he'll be a bad kid - I don't see that - but the quieter one, the one who pushes the boundaries just a bit while Buddy tries to reign him in - that I can see.

Bean's a great mom. Her boys have boundaries, but they are also have wild imaginations and are free to explore lots of things. They are being taught to live a green life, and are in a house with lots of hearty laughter and happy trips to get 3 for $1 doughnuts at Fred Meyer. They are taught how to pray and be kind and have faith, and there's a lot of hope for that kind of childhood. I know I couldn't possibly love them more, and if only I lived closer, I would try to encourage all this goodness the best I could. I can't wait to see how they turn out. It's true that having sisters might be helpful for less sullen teenage years, so I'm all for Bean getting what she wants.